The Case for the Redistribution of Ecotourism Gains in Kenya. Essay

The Case for the Redistribution of Ecotourism Gains in Kenya.Introduction Ecotourism, also known as amenable tourism, is defined as responsible travel to natural areas, which conserves the environment and sustains the well-being of local people . Ecotourism has become the fastest exploitation sub-sector of the tourist industry in the Third World, it is growing at a rate of 6% per year . Bordering the Indian Ocean and located in Eastern Africa, Kenya reaps substantial benefits from ecotourism activities. Kenyas rich biodiversity and natural resources accommodate it to earn as much as 1/3 of its total foreign exchange revenues from ecotourism . A recent study of game farming in Kenya has shown that wildlife tourism was fifty times more lucrative than cattle grazing and that an elephant herd was valued at $610,000 annually . Ecotourism will therefore play a predominant role in the countrys economic development. In order to esteem the equity implications of ecotourism in Ken ya, this paper will attempt to assess the distributional impacts of the policies local authorities have undertaken in Kenya to foster ecotourism and to propose suggested reforms and recommendations to help groups, who have traditionally been marginalized such as the Maasai.BackgroundKenya was a protectorate and a British colony from the late 1890s to December 1963, when the country gained its independence. Although Kenya is a relatively stable country, it has only been governed by 3 Presidents (from only 2 political parties) since independence. With a population of 31.3 million people , Kenya is a multi-ethnic country, whose administrative arrangements closely parallel ethnic boundaries . With a GNI/ capita of $360 , Kenya is still a ... ...ashington, D.C. Island Press.http//www.stpt.usf.edu/jsokolov/211maasai.htm, The Maasai of Kenya and Tanzania, option 1998http//whc.unesco.org/pg.cfm?cid=160, World Heritage Convention, UNESCOKamuaro, O. Ecotourism Suicide or Development?. Avail able from www.unsystem.org/ngls/documents/publications.en/voices.africa/number6/vfa6.12.htmUnited States Agency for International Development. 1996. Mid-Term Evaluation. Washington D.C. United States Agency for International Development.World Bank, http/devdata.worldbank.org/ outside/CPProfile.asp?CCODE=KEN&PTYPE=CP, Country profile Table, The World Bank Group.World Bank, http//www.worldbank.org/ke/ke_ctry_brief.htm, Country Brief, The World Bank Group in Kenya.Zecchini, A. Clash of Interests in Maasai Country- Kenyas difference of opinion for Biodiversity, Le Monde Diplomatique, November 2000